home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT0868>
- <title>
- Apr. 09, 1990: Some Help For Working Moms
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Apr. 09, 1990 America's Changing Colors
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 39
- Some Help for Working Moms
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Congress finally passes a child-care bill
- </p>
- <p> If there was one social program that congressional Democrats
- could exploit as a campaign rallying cry, it was child care.
- With elections looming this fall, they should have been in a
- position to trumpet their efforts to help working mothers, 75%
- of whom tell pollsters that they are unable to find adequate
- care for their children while they are on the job. Instead,
- House Democrats have allowed the first nationwide child-care
- system to become mired in committee turf battles for six
- months. As Olympia Snowe, a Maine Republican, tartly observed
- last week, "If this bill were an actual child, Congress long
- ago would have been found guilty of abuse and neglect."
- </p>
- <p> On one side of the impasse was Congressman Thomas Downey of
- New York, who wanted to pay for expanded day-care services
- through existing block grants to the states, which are less
- subject to Congress's political whims. On the other side was
- Congressman Augustus Hawkins of California, who wanted the
- Federal Government to give the money directly to child-care
- providers. Hawkins, an 82-year-old New Dealer who will retire
- from Congress this year after serving 14 terms, would like to
- be remembered for his work on a major new social program.
- </p>
- <p> Last week, after beating back a White House-supported effort
- to further water down the Democrats' approach, Congress finally
- settled on a plan. Members voted 265 to 145 to establish a
- system that will provide $27 billion over five years to poor
- parents through income-tax credits and direct subsidies. The
- bill requires states to set health standards at day-care
- centers, expands Head Start programs for poor children and
- provides school-based care for up to 10 million so-called
- latchkey kids who would otherwise go unattended after school.
- In a compromise with conservatives, Democrats agreed to require
- states to issue vouchers that parents can use to pay for child
- care even at centers operated by religious institutions.
- </p>
- <p> The bill will now go to a House-Senate conference committee,
- where it will again be rewritten before being sent on to the
- White House. There it may fare no better than a child-care
- program that Richard Nixon vetoed in 1971. Objecting to the
- high cost of the program and federal standards for child-care
- centers, a senior Bush Administration official pronounced the
- bill a "monstrosity" and promised a veto. There will be more
- partisan bickering while the urgent needs of parents and
- children go unmet.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-